GOING BACK TO THE GARDEN

GOING BACK TO THE GARDEN
http://www.cmy.on.ca/toraportions200...kra/tazria.htm (Online version)
Congregation Melech Yisrael, Toronto, Canada
Shabbat April 5, 2003, 3 Nisan 5763
http://www.cmy.on.ca / cmy@ca.inter.net

This week's Reading list:
* Vayikra / Leviticus 12:1-13:59
* Melachim Beit / 2 Kings 4:42-5:19
* Mattityahu / Matthew 8:1-4
* Romim / Romans 6:19 - 23
* Shabbat Candle lighting for Toronto and surrounding areas
* Shabbat Candles 6:28 p.m.
* Havdallah Candles 7:39 p.m.


Vayikra {12:6} When the days of her purifying are fulfilled, for a son, or for a daughter, she shall bring a lamb a year old for an olah offering, and a young pigeon, or a turtle-dove, for a sin-offering, to the door of the Ohel Moed (Tent of Meeting) to the cohen (priest): {12:7} and he shall offer it before HaSHEM, and make Kapparah (Draw near) for her; and she shall be tahor (clean) cleansed from the fountain of her blood. This is The Torah for her who bears, whether a male or a female. {12:8} If her means isn't sufficient for a lamb, then she shall take two turtle-doves, or two young pigeons; the one for an olah offering, and the other for a sin-offering: and the cohen shall make Kapparah for her, and she shall be tahor.

I find these Scripture intriguing! Is it a sin to bear children? Why did a new mother have to bring a sin offering to the L-rd after giving birth? I can understand making an offering for the purpose of purification, but why for sin? Ask as you may however, the Scriptures are silent on this point. Although there may be many possible explanations on why, the truth of the matter is that no one really knows why. I feel safe therefore in adding my voice to what I am sure is already a long list of opinions.

One possible scenario and perhaps the one most commonly accepted is the shedding of blood explanation. We are all aware of the importance the L-rd places on blood. It was to used as the substitutionary atonement for our sin; it is, we are told, the life of all flesh (Vayikra 17:11) and there are grave consequences if a person sheds another person's blood. In addition on completion of her monthly cycle a woman is instructed to bring a similar sin offering as above, to the L-rd (Vayikra 15.19ff). Menstruation involves the shedding of blood, so the shedding or passing of blood is considered worthy of a sin offering by the L-rd. G-d however gives no such instruction if one should cut their finger or scrape their knee, two of many other ways blood may also be shed. So why does G-d single out menstruation and child birth as requiring a sin offering? Here therefore is my opinion.

I believe the sin offering requirement has to do with the original sin! It was Chava's (Eve) disobedience to G-d, which resulted in the curses placed against her and her ultimate expulsion from Gan Eden (the Garden of Eden). Chava's roll in this expulsion obviously was serious enough for G-d to put this perpetual requirement upon her and through her to the rest of female humanity.

G-d's desire and the ultimate goal of salvation is to return man to that Gan Eden state with G-d, a state which he lost due to sin. As women are the vessel used by G-d to bring new life into the world, perpetuating humanity, G-d in His infite wisdom decided she must continually be reminded of the importance of her roll in bringing future generations into the world. He accomplishes this by the pain involved both in menstruation and childbirth. This pain, which also involves the shedding of blood would not have been present nor would it had occurred had sin not entered Chava's heart. Therefore as a result of the curse of pain, every time menstruation or childbirth occurs, woman is reminded of her sinful nature and G-d is reminded that man is no longer conceived holy but rather in sin thus requiring a sin offering.

Tehillim (Psalms) {51:5} Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.

Sin is not a pleasant thing to G-d and having his creatures born into sin is not compatible with a right relationship with Him. G-d's ultimate plan of salvation is for us to return to that Gan Eden state of life and relationship with Him. Let this Parasha therefore be a reminder to us all of how far the world has fall away from G-d. However through the shed blood of Mashiach (Messiah) Yeshua, and for those who have applied it to themselves, they have entered back into the Garden. Once again they can experience the exhilaration of walking and talking with G-d. Soon Machiach will return and as the Aitz Chaim (Tree of Life) He will dwell in the midst of us and take up His rightful place in the middle of His Garden, the place He had to leave because of original sin........

*****************************
Baruch HaShem
Rabbi Jack (Yaacov) Farber


Hallelujah to our L-rd, our Teacher, our Rabbi, "YESHUA" King Messiah for ever and ever!!!

Visit our Webpage @ http://www.cmy.on.ca / cmy@ca.inter.net
272 Rannee Ave Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6A-1N6
Tel: 416-785-7612

An ever changing Messianic Jewish website
till King Mashiach Yeshua comes back!!!

Shalom Shalom....

[paizanoc]

The Muslims consider their Al Koran as sacred revelation given to analphabet Mohamed. Something similar happens with the Jews who gave too much consideration to analphabet Rabbi Akivva who did an ordered compilation of thousands of years of oral tradition according to what he understood. He was a man of faith indeed, however do we have to trust 100% in his understanding of the Scriptures?
The Scriptures passed through many hands, Massorahs added their own spice to what God revealed. So it’s not easy to understand the things. Here we just read an interpretation about Garden of Eden. They’ve always given attention to symbolisms and “spiritual” understanding perhaps lacking real knowledge of the meaning of the Scriptures. Genesis 2:10-14 is not talking about spiritual realm called Eden but a geographical location. Euphrates river is even mentioned. Yet Euphrates is not a Hebrew name. In Sumerian language of Mesopotamian land the name was URUTU and the root URU has the same name of Quechua language of the Incas in Peru meaning “river of copper”, something Euphrates never was, unless in other historical times that river only received ships made of reed coming from the Andes. The same copper used in the Andes had Mesopotamian name URUDU, OURI, YAURI. Hence, it’s no surprise that even proto-Sumerian language of Mesopotamia and other similarities between Sumerian culture and Incas and Aymara cultures were found in the Andes!

www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/7051/Awen3a.htm
www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/7051/poko2.htm
www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/7051/bpokotia.htm
http://pub69.ezboard.com/fancientlosttreasuresfrm30.showMessage?topicID=16.topic
Euphrates was not the original name of the river. Today in Irak it’s known with the name Al-afarat while river Tigris is called Degla. The name POTOSI in Bolivia is the Sumerian term of king-priest PATEEIS and of course, while Rabbies spend most of their time investigating their particular language they have no idea whatsoever why Quechua language of the Incas and Aymara of the Tiahuanaco people are languages related to Hebrew, not just false cognates but in the root of the language, not only similar phonetic or sound but also meaning. This is something known by linguists and philologists not by them, so why wasting my time trying to convince them? Not at all!
Genesis 10:25-29 mentions a name Phaleg/Peleg/Faleg as a memorial name of the time when the Earth was split. It’s not a symbolic division but actual literal division of the planet, not the “country” as it is translated in some versions of the Bible. And it’s pretty evident the whole Earth was completely changed after Universal Deluge (not local floods). So, what kind of Euphrates or Tigris are we referring to in the previous account of the Eden Garden? Obviously that was a latter record “applying” the previous events to Mesopotamia, but was it so? Genesis 2:11,12 gives the detail description of an Eden filled with excellent gold. The name of the country is given, HEVILA. Not a coincidence the fact HEVILA and his brother OPIR descent from the same Phaleg I mentioned beginning this paragraph. Opir was the literal place abundant in gold if we believe Job 28:1-6; 1 Kings 9:28; Isaiah 13:12 and Salomon imported metals and other things from there. Please check the site:

www.geocities.com/webatlantis/fuentemagna.htm

I have mentioned the Andes, it’s not coincidence that Opir is inverted homophonous of the name Piro/Piroa/Peru, the land of gold. Evidence of contact between civilizations is something discussed and the orthodox geologists, historians, Egyptologist are reluctant to admit things breaking their “truth”. Even now we know cocaine & nicotine was found in Egyptian mummies and it’s too long an issue to discuss it without beating around the bush this theme. In Phoenician, Assyrian, Syrian languages the name “fruit” is D’Piarea, Opiaraoh, Piaroa and nobody is sure where the name of the country “Peru” comes from but in Quechua language of the Incas the name means “storehouse” or “granary” to keep all kind of fruits. It’s recorded by the Spaniard Chronics the name comes from the ancient RIVER BIRÚ. Where was that?
Don’t ask the Rabbies, they are not interested in such a thing. Machu Picchu in Cuzco was the heart of Tawantinsuyo empire spread all over many countries, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador. The river of Cuzco is URUbamba and like URUTU the name of Babilonian river, the root URU or UR is identical to the land of Avraam and, of course, the reed artificial islands both in Sumeria and Bolivia not mentioning the ships. The Urubamba river or Vilcanota are part of the Amazon Eden jungle eventually heading to Atlantic Ocean. Now a secret the Rabbies ignore:
VILCANOTA AND URUBAMBA RIVERS HAVE THE SAME SHAPE AS TIGRIS AND EUPHRATES AS SEEN FROM SATELLITE.
Not quite enough? I tell you more. Please repeat several times the name CAIN-CAIN-CAIN-CAIN. Isn’t it true the sound transforms into INCA-INCA-INCA? This is inverted homophonous name very old indeed. In Mesopotamian myths Cain is also mentioned with the same sound as in Spanish. It’s not like in English like saying Citizen Kane but KA-IN. Even the Spanish priests who knew Hebrew were astonished. Later they found out the history of the Incas didn’t start with all that culture just in 12th Century but indeed there was a long list of 104 Incas starting with one called PIRUA, the writing was forbidden. And you know what? It was discovered –by English William Burns Glynn, the actual writing of them called “k’elkan” or “quilcas” represented consonants and numbers pretty much like Hebrew. Though he has critics, the message of the geometrical designs in the clothes of the Incas was decoded. Even the mnemotechnique system of the ropes with knots called QUIPUS had the similar form and purpose of the Hebrew tzit tzit in the priests clothes to remember the 613 laws (mitzvots). So even as back as in 15th Century the priests knowing Hebrew language, Greek, etc, started to wonder if the Incas were not part of the lost sheep from Israel, the lost tribes. What I’m saying is this history is even older. That’s why we can find Proto-Sumerian language in Peru and Bolivia, very old times. At those times Titicaca river was part of a sea and not a huge lake. There was a harbor there and it’s been examined by submarine archeology experts.
Difficult to swallow? Everything presented new provokes controversy and skepticism. The Book of Jubilees says the name of Cain’s wife. She was her sister-wife named AWAN. Haven’t I just explained the empire of the Incas was called T-AWAN-tinsuyo? Isn’t it true the Egyptians and Incas and Sumerian elite married brother and sisters of the same father but different mother? You can see the name uses the prefix T which in Hebrew was a mark, the TAU. The same happens in Mexico where we can find a city which in Nahuatl language of the Aztecs was named “T-ENOCH-titlán”. Don’t ask the Rabbies! They won’t tell you –cos they don’t know- the name means exactly the same thing mentioned in Genesis 4:17: “City of Enoc”. Of course, the Maya history is older than historians are willing to accept preceded by Aztecs and perhaps Olmecas but the thing is they had a memory of events lost in past and remembered an ancient person treated like a heroe. The very pyramid of the Sun in Mexico is a calendar representing the number 365 which is the age attributed to Biblical Enoc in Genesis 5:23, 24 when God took him. And the Apocaliptic number 144.000 from 12 tribes of Israel (12.000 people from each one of the 12 tribes) is also the number of Maya calendar called Baktún. And decoding the message from Palenque Lord in Mexico you will read the very number appears in his forehead. Read Maurice Cotterell’s “The Lost Tomb of Viracocha”. Of course, I gotta remind you THERE ARE TWO ENOCS in Genesis and one was precisely Cain’s son! Therefore I tend to disagree with the Christians saying all these things were memories after Nimrod, Babel Tower linguistic chaos. These things belong to older times, when Cain’s offspring wonder in the land of Nu. The Mesopotamian account mentions Donnu which the abbreviated form. I tend to think Cain and his offspring wander in pre-Deluge planet different from it is now and those events didn’t start in Mesopotamia but in South or Central America and then after reaching other points of the planet. Of course, this is not the truth & nothing but the truth, it’s just a way trying to understand the real message hidden in the Bible. The Earthy things are part of what Creator allowed to happen. Isaiah 41:22, 23 admits to see the future is important to know what happened in the past. That’s why sometimes the future events are written in prophetic past or vice versa. In the same way, the Quechua language of the Incas had a single word to define both space and time: PACHA.

[paizanoc]

http://pub69.ezboard.com/fancientlos...picID=16.topic
http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/7051/Awen3a.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/7051/poko2.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/7051/bpokotia.htm
http://www.geocities.com/webatlantis/fuentemagna.htm
http://www.lexiline.com/lexiline/lexi154.htm
The Rabbi is not gonna tell you the "sin" was something of different nature. Genesis 3 admits Satan, the snake spoke about the fruit of the tree of knowledge, the science and the opening of the eyes and yet God talking in plural (this was not majestic plural of excellence but REAL PLURAL and nothing to do with Pagan trinity) admits in fact Adam & Eve BECAME GODS LIKE THEM ! Compare 3:1-5 with verses 22-24. Therefore Satan didn't lie. So what was the sin Satan comitted with Eve that deserve the damnation in 3:14?
The word "yadhá" in Hebrew means "knowing by experience" and this "knowing" has sexual connotation in Gen 4:1, 17 and 25 when says Adam KNEW HIS WIFE AGAIN. It wasn't a case of "glad to meet you ONCE AGAIN, darling" cos everytime that "knowing" happened, a child was born.
The effect of the sin was not in the hand stealing the fruit nor the mouth eating the fruit but the euphemistic "hips" and we know the pain of pregnancy is an effect of sex. The pain was increased, wasn't it? The baby male Cain was the product of the "sexual sin". The conscience of the couple set an arrow to the human parts of the sin, it was sexual organs. They hid them with fig leaves (3:7,8) and then after the same plural god considered not appropiate clothes and provided them with larger animal skin (3:21). This is not symbolic at all with ontogenic interpratation of androgin entities becoming human beings! This is a way to dicover the hidden and literal truth some Jews are well aware of. Because they know the real sin was not Satan's lie because plural god admits not only Adam & Eve became gods like them but they eventually would take THE OTHER TREE, the tree of knowledge. Ask your Rabbi what happened and he won't tell you Satan named Samael HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH MOTHER EVE and Cain was the product, that was the son created with the help of the "lord" in Genesis 4:1. It was not the Lord Almighty IEVE but son of Satan himself. Samael is the poison or venom of god, in Hebrew meaning. The Jewish myths explain he considered himself an arcangel but we know it's a lie cos "arcangel" is only singular in the Bible and applies only to Mikael, the one who reflects God's image cos his face is invisible. Therefore is his exact image. No wonder there are many texts in the Bible linking him with the Messiah!

[paizanoc]

You just have to search in the internet who was Samael and you'll find what Rabbies won't tell you. They won't say Samael is connected with sucubus Lillith who was mentioned by Isaiah 34:14; Zecariah 5:9 and the real cherub spiritual entities with animal shape. They would prefer not believing in Satan as real evil but evil within. They are naïve if they think so.
I did a mistake, I wrote the other tree was the tree of knowledge. No, that was the first tree, the science or knowing the good and evil and knowledge. God forbid the access to the second one, the tree of everlasting life. So, something happened. The scientists are discovering the melatonine of the so-called 3rd eye (pituitary gland)is related to longevity and we know the life span in Genesis diminushed step by step, slowly until we reach our ridiculous life span compared with imbecil giant turtle in Galapagos achieving 150 or 200 years old. Even a parrot or a swan can live 80 years perhaps without cancer while 3% of our total DNA is junk "acacaca" (adenine-citosine...instead of adenine-timine, citosine-guanine).
The apostle Paul confessed (2 Chorintians 11:3)EVE'S THOUGHTS were corrupted!
How come an invisible entity can "chat" with human being and deceive her to commit sex? Isn't it true "spiritism" has always been practiced with hallucinogenic shamanic procedures?
Search the following thing about SERPENTS OF LIGHT ;
http://www.jornalinfinito.com.br/series.asp?cod=81
http://www.jornalinfinito.com.br/series.asp?cod=80
http://www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
http://www.sitchin.com/images/adam1.jpg
And there you have the secret of why the Genesis list doubles names like Enoch, Lamech or switch number-letters from parents and children which are so similar. They are hiding the truth there were not 2 lists, IT WAS THE SAME LIST but didn't want to show to the world the MOTHER ASPECT of the list. Though women are not mentioned by name, it was the attribute of the gods and women to name the children. It was a cursed seed in the blood, the mother would retain the BLOOD ASPECT of divinity, but not from God's divinity but devil's divinity. So when the children of God mingled and had sex with women from the Earth, they imitated something performed by the cherub in Eden.That's why Ezekiel 28:13-20 compares the arrogant way of prince of Tyrus (meaning MARS in Phoenicia)with the cherub in Eden who hab a terrible behavior and practiced iniquity and "comerce", sexual comerce with Eve I tell ya! He had to be definitly expelled from "stones of fire" and house-mountain of God. In Mesopotamian language those "mountains" were real pyramids.
Interesting is to remember some hallucinogenic "trees of knowledge" do have the same chemical pattern of serotonine and endorphines in the brain and it's like key and lock together. That's why the human eyes can see more than the usual limited 0.5 % of the frequences available. In that realm you can taste the colors and smell the sound and talk with animals like telapaty. I know for sure and the people who study this (botanists) know for sure.
The name spiritism is mentioned by Paul and it's related to Greek word "pharmakya" meaning drugstore. So, it's not astonishing if hallucinogenic substances are used in incense, even John Baptist's father could easily see an angel when he as near the incense, Luke 1:8-11. And a Jew Rabbi told me about some secrets of Mambre trees where Avraam saw 3 angels appearing and dissapearing and eventually "energized" their bodies into human just to take breakfast, Genesis 18.
We know Satan can transform into light (2 Chorinthians 11:14). The Greek word here is "metaschematizo" meaning metamorphosis or trabsfiguration or disguise. So at the level of light, it was piece of cake for Samael/Satan to appear in frequences to Eve's mind and corrupted her thoughts as Paul said in the same chapter, verse 3.
Indeed, the human brain can be seen as a tree in biological shape as seen parted from inside, but you don't wanna know about it, right Rabbies?

[paizanoc]

The ancient people knew the blood aspect within women's blood and that's why they breeded among brothers and sisters of the same father but different mother. They dodged genetic mutations cos they didn't practice all the time but had some rules and it could explain why the Biblical god many times favours not the first born as it should be but other children, it could explain why Abraham and other patriarchs married their sisters-wives. With time these marriages had to be forbidden cos the seed was getting corrupted in biological & spiritual manner.

[paizanoc]

There are secrets hidden inside other secrets. Christ compared himself with snake in a sole stick as set by Moses in the snake of copper (nehash nehoshet means snake and copper like in Spanish "cobra" is similar to "cobre" for reasons the Rabbies don't know). John 3:14; Numbers 21:8,9. Copper was used by ancient people to make genetic experiences with hormones, including fertility hormones,that was the secret of Cain's offspring taught by "gods". Genesis 4:22. In Egypt, the godess Isis was depicted and her helpers were using a single snake wrapped around the ceptre. It means the moment of se-pa-ra-tion of the chromosomes after the ones of the father and mother gather to produce the child. Christ was not only the son of a virgin but he was the giver of life, the descent of the sacred DNA. Moses didn't set a couple of snakes but just like in Egyptian Isis (the virgin giving birth to Horus) it was a single snake in a stick. In fact the esoteric meaning of the Hebrew snake means the one who knows the secret of copper.
http://www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
http://www.sitchin.com/images/adam1.jpg
Samael altered Eve's DNA breeding with her. That was the big mistake the Watchers commited afterwards if we believe Judas and Peter and Genesis 6 not to mention the universal legends of the world refering to giants offspring of male demons who had sex with women from the Earth. And I am not naïve to think Smithsonian Institute will show the evidence of such giants hidden in its dungeons if even a Jalapa museum in Mexico hid an elephant ancient toy of the Mayas to hide from the public there were -or the Mayas saw or African and Hindu people traveled to other continents before Columbus- elephants in Mexico! But that's another theme.
In parthenogenesis ("virgin origin" in Greek)it occures the duplicatin of chromosome X into XX and the result would be a baby girl. So if Christ was to be born from Mary's womb, there had to be real genetic antecedent from the promised seed plus the equivalent to Y chromosome sent by His Father via satelite, then the resukt would be XY, a baby boy and not a girl. God altered the normal functions of Avraam and Sara (old couple) to re-new them and Isaac was born, a typical shadow of the Messiah though his death was not required cos he was saved at the last minute and replaced by the lamb.